top of page

The Problem 

Research & Insights

Design Process

Final Design 

Reflection 

Itineroo

Group Travel-Planning Mobile & Desktop App

Itineroo Cover Project Page.png

Project Overview

​For my HCI capstone project at DePaul University, I worked with two teammates to create Itineroo, a mobile and desktop application that helps groups plan trips more collaboratively and seamlessly. My role spanned user research, UX/UI design, prototyping, and usability testing.

 

Group travel planning is messier than it should be. Itineroo was our solution to that, a single platform that keeps everyone aligned before, during, and after a trip.

Role

UX Researcher, UX Designer, Presenter

Timeline

10 Weeks (Spring 2025)

Tools

Figma, Useberry, Google Slides, Tableu

The Problem

01. The Problem

Group travel planning is often scattered across multiple channels, such as Google Docs, spreadsheets, and group chats. This can lead to miscommunication, uneven planning contributions, and financial friction. Existing apps on the market address parts of the problem but fall short on collaborative features, budget transparency, and full trip-lifecycle support for users.

This led us to ask: How might we design an all-in-one platform that simplifies travel planning and keeps groups on the same page?

Itineroo project goals: collaborative planning, budgeting, and trip lifecycle support.
Research & Insights

02. Research & Insights

Competitive Review + Sentiment Analysis 

We scraped and analyzed thousands of iOS App Store reviews for two current travel planning apps, TripIt and Wanderlog. While both apps were generally well-liked (65% and 82% positive sentiment, respectively), the most negatively-reviewed categories pointed directly to our opportunity: broken collaboration features, poor financial tooling, and paywall frustration.

TripIt app interface on three smartphones.
Wanderlog app interface shown on three smartphones.
  • No financial tooling.

  • Plain UI, no exciting imagery for upcoming vacation.

  • Rely on exact search, rather than suggestive search.

  • Focus on pre-trip ideation, during-trip events, and after-trip reflection.

  • Individualized process, but allows joint itineraries.

ios App Store ratings comparison for TripIt and Wanderlog

IOS App Store Competitive Reviews of TripIt and Wanderlog

Sentiment analysis for Tripit and Wanderlog showing positive, neutral, and negative percentages.

Sentiment Analysis of TripIt and Wanderlog

Interview Protocol

To understand how people actually plan group trips, we conducted 10 interviews with frequent travelers aged

23–32 who regularly use technology to research and book trips. Each session included 22 structured questions covering trip planning habits, group dynamics, budgeting, and post-trip reflection.

Itineroo interview process: demographics, planning, and tech use.

Interview Questions Outline

We paired every interview with a journey mapping activity, asking participants to walk us through their most recent group trip across four stages: selecting a travel destination, planning the details, during the trip, and returning home. For each stage, we captured their actions, motivations, challenges, and emotions. This helped us pinpoint exactly where group coordination tends to break down and where the biggest design opportunities lived.

Travel planning journey map showing user stages and emotions.

Figjam user journey map interview template

Interview Findings

We categorized responses by theme and created 116 unique tags to identify trends. Four patterns emerged consistently across participants:​

  • Uneven Contributions — One or two people typically ended up owning the entire planning process, leading to frustration and burnout. 

  • Adaptable Itineraries — Travelers preferred loose structure over rigid schedules, planning around daily themes while leaving room for spontaneity.

  • Loose Budgeting — Most participants tracked expenses mentally and deferred smaller costs to deal with later, creating post-trip financial awkwardness.

  • No Defined Roles — Without clear responsibilities, communication gaps formed and planning stalled, especially when group members were slow to respond.​​

 

These findings directly shaped our feature priorities: group voting to distribute decision-making, shared budget tracking to surface costs in real time, and mood check-ins and journaling to support the emotional side of travel.

Figjam digital whiteboard with organized sticky notes of interview categorization and tagging process.
Interview common tags.

Figjam of interview categorization and tagging process

Most common tags

Design Process

03. Design Process

User Personas

We developed two personas from our interviews:

  • Amanda - a detail-oriented trip organizer who wants group input without the chaos.

  • Kevin - a budget-conscious participant who wants financial visibility without the awkwardness of asking friends to split costs.

Itineroo primary user persona for Amanda Reyes.

Amanda (Primary Persona)

Itineroo secondary user persona for Kevin Nguyen.

Kevin (Secondary Persona)

Preliminary Sketches

Before moving into Figma, we sketched early concepts for both mobile and desktop to explore layout possibilities and key user flows, including budgeting, group voting, and itinerary management. Sketching allowed us to quickly surface ideas, debate tradeoffs as a team, and identify information density issues early, before investing time in digital design.

Hand-drawn UI sketches for Itineroo trip planning app.

Early Sketches

Lo-Fi Prototypes

Using Figma, we built low-fidelity mobile prototypes focusing on Itineroo's four core features: group voting, budget tracking, activity discovery, and mood tracking. Each feature had a defined user flow to guide testing. Rather than focusing on visuals at this stage, we prioritized structure, making sure the right information was in the right place and that key tasks felt intuitive before investing in high-fidelity design.

Before Trip Screens

Quick actions lo-fi mobile screen.

Quick Actions

The app’s home page

Quick access to documents, finance, activities, and voting features

“To Do” widget with any pending items - polls, budget approvals, etc.

Itinerary for each day of the trip

Group voting lo-fi mobile screen.

Group Voting

Vote in Active Polls & See other group members’ responses

Create a new poll

Specify poll options, including expiration times, voter identification preferences, and the ability to add a new poll option as a participant

View completed or expired polls

During Trip Screens

Discover activites lo-fi mobile screen.

Discover Activities

Rate activities you have already completed

If you like the activity, find similar recommendations near you

Search for other types of activities like food/drink or entertainment

List view of suggestions with links that can bring you to more information

Budget tracking lo-fi mobile screen.

Budget Tracking

View data visualizations and list breakdowns of your trips’ budget

View budget for all your expenses or only split expenses

Make real time edits to categories

View expanded day-by-day budget breakdowns

Submit and/or approve group budget change requests

Mood tracking lo-fi mobile screen.

Mood Tracking

Log your mood and record short notes throughout your trip

View group members’ moods throughout the trip

Log a daily journal entry

View visualizations for all mood and journal data throughout the trip

Usability Testing

We conducted two rounds of usability testing with 36 participants total, using scenario-based tasks and click heatmaps to evaluate key flows. Testing was run remotely and asynchronously through Useberry, which allowed us to import our Figma prototypes directly and collect behavioral data at scale. We then visualized the results in Tableau to identify patterns across completion rates, click paths, and time-on-task.

Itineroo usability testing workflow and design process.

Usability Testing Timeline

Click heatmap data for budget editing V1 mobile.
Click heatmap data for budget editing V1 desktop.

Click heatmap data for budget editing V1

Click heatmap data for budget editing V2 mobile.
Click heatmap data for budget editing V2 desktop.

Click heatmap data for budget editing V2

After each round of testing, we analyzed completion rates, click paths, and open-ended feedback to guide targeted improvements. Key changes between V1 and V2 included reorganizing the voting tab structure, relocating the budget edit button to a more intuitive location, and reducing visual clutter on the home screen.

Between V1 and V2, task completion rose to 100%, and average clicks per task dropped by 1.87, confirming that our changes were moving in the right direction. Throughout this process, we let measurable feedback drive decisions rather than assumptions.

Tableau Data Visualizations
Itineroo Low-Fi V1 Usability Test Results dashboard displaying an 88.89% completion rate and data for 18 participants.
Itineroo Low-Fi V2 usability test results dashboard showing a 100% completion rate.

High-level KPIs revealed:

  • Longer time taken to complete tasks, with more clicks than expected

  • Two participants did not finish

  • Higher tech-savvy people found the test easier

  • On average, users found the tasks medium difficult

  • Participants struggled more with budget editing and creating a new poll

High-level KPIs revealed:

  • Task completion time increased, but ease of use score increased, and the average number of clicks decreased

  • All 20 participants completed

Final Design

04. Final Design

Hi-Fi Prototype

The final high-fidelity prototype brought Itineroo to life across mobile and desktop, each designed with intentional use cases in mind. The mobile app supports on-the-go tasks like checking the itinerary, viewing real-time budget updates, and submitting daily mood check-ins. The desktop version is geared toward more involved planning and reflection tasks, like uploading travel documents, reviewing detailed finance breakdowns, and writing post-trip journals. Together, they support travelers before, during, and after their trip. 

To jump to the mobile or desktop screens, select from the options below. 

Itineroo mobile mockups.
Mobile Screens
Itineroo travel dashboard for a New Orleans trip on a laptop.
Desktop Screens
Mobile

Mobile Walkthroughs

Before a trip

Onboarding 

Creating a profile

Creating or joining a trip

Adding travelers from contacts

Specifying system preferences & customization

Homescreen

Quick actions easily distinguishable

Multiple ways to navigate to another screen

Horizontal scrolling multi-day itinerary cards

Group Voting 

Ability to collapse/expand polls to minimize visual clutter

Visually distinct chip action bar to switch between polls

Creating a new poll

Ability to opt out of voting

Visual indicator for who voted and who has not

View poll result after casting a vote

Manage Budget & Finances

View individual and group budget data visualizations

Expand day-by-day spending breakdowns per category

Make edits to spending categories & expand daily

Submit and/or approve group budget change requests

During a trip

Discover Things to Do

Renamed from "Discover Activities" to be more all-encompassing

View activity suggestions

Search map by category

List view option

Add activity from map/list directly to itinerary

Mood Tracking & Journal Logs

Log your mood and record short notes throughout your trip

View group members’ moods throughout the trip and comment on them

View overall mood trends and journal data

Option to make mood or journal logs private or visible to the group

After a trip
Desktop

Post-Trip Reflection

Log a post-trip reflection on the last day of the trip

View group members’ reflections and comment on them

Vote on group member superlatives

Option to make trip reflection private or visible to the group

Desktop Screens

Iterative Changes 

Allow users to navigate the desktop version with the footer.​

Make the “upload document” button more obvious.​

​Increase size of home header content navigable to travel document upload page.

Fix incorrect click paths between screens to reduce user error and confusion.

Homepage

hompage screen.png

Document Upload

Budget & Finance Management

budget and finance managment screen.png

Design System

We developed a full design system to ensure visual consistency across mobile and desktop. Our color palette was pulled from three candidate options voted on by our class. The final result blends warm and cool tones that feel energetic without being overwhelming. We chose the typeface Outfit for its clean, modern readability across screen sizes. The kangaroo mascot, which won 77.8% of the class vote, anchors the brand identity and carries through the app in playful variations used across onboarding and loading states.

Color Palette

Typography Styles (not to scale)

Brand Imagery

Logo Variations

Additional Imagery

Reflection

05. Reflection

Itineroo successfully addressed key user pain points by centralizing planning tasks, improving financial transparency, and enabling real collaborative decision-making. Usability testing confirmed strong demand for group budgeting and voting features, and showed measurable gains in user clarity and confidence across core workflows.

If we continued, we'd focus on simplifying some of the more complex interfaces, expanding hi-fi usability testing with a broader participant pool, and exploring iOS development for a functional build. Longer term, we'd love to pitch Itineroo to potential stakeholders and explore UI customization options surfaced during research.

This project reinforced something I'll carry into every project going forward: that good design decisions are only as strong as the research and iteration behind them.

Let's Keep in Touch

© 2026 by Marianne McCarthy. All rights reserved.

bottom of page